Tuesday, November 20, 2012

E-Commerce


            Electronic commerce has redefined sales across the board; business-to-consumer sales are personalized to a level never before imagined. The significance of e-commerce resonates through all industries some more than others. The earliest instance of e-commerce is in 1979 of Michael Aldrich who invented online shopping; essentially his method included a real time transaction-processing computer connected to a domestic telephone line in the UK. At its most primitive form this was a simple exchange of data over a landline, however, the greatest change occurs closer towards present time.
            E-commerce activity picks up in the mid-1990’s, during this time big companies make an entrance to e-commerce. Several companies were launched during this time, these include ebay- an online auction site, amazon- now the largest online store, and Dell’s website for sales online direct to consumers. Companies like these had a slow start introducing a new concept for shopping; consumer trust could not be established for credit card transactions especially with an auction site like ebay where transactions are between users. Traction was not solid until the early 2000’s when Amazon.com had their first profitable year and ebay acquires PayPal for $1.5 billion, by the mid-2000’s reputable companies set a standard for secure online payments and e-commerce accounted for 2.5% of total retail sales in the US. Throughout the past ten years e-commerce has experienced steady growth as a percent of total retail sales in spite of a drop in total retail sales through the recession. This signals a shift towards online shopping as opposed to retail store shopping. Companies incapable of adapting to the changing landscape suffer the consequences. One obvious example is Best Buy, this big box retailer did not shift to online sales fast enough and resulted in being a showroom for online retailers like Amazon.com. Mostly because it is easier to compare prices online and big box retailers incur higher costs with actual storefronts. Adding to this, actual stores have limited space, what does this mean? Retailers can only hold inventory that will sell most and fastest, holding popular products can only capture a fraction of consumers. Online retailers have a significant advantage here by serving the long tail. The common example is Netflix, this streaming company virtually has unlimited space for products available at any point in time, by offering a larger selection of movies more consumers are satisfied without worrying of using valuable shelf space.
            E-commerce has greatly improved as more information is collected on the consumer. By following consumer habits online, internet companies can predict consumer preferences, examples include Netflix with movie recommendations, and Amazon with product recommendations. Data on consumer allows for effective targeted promotions with higher sales than traditional retail stores. Looking onward, technology continues to improve and an increasing number of consumers adopt internet shopping, soon product management will entail lower level design intended to target more specific consumers by further segmented consumers. Anticipated technology includes software that tracks eye movement in order to optimize page layout designs and marketing. Furthermore, merging with social networks, online retailers will have abundant information on the average consumer, including food preferences with yelp, travel habits through travel sites linked through major social networks. Soon the marketing executive position will become too simple to stand alone.

Skype




Technically speaking, Skype is a licensed software application and voice-over-Internet Protocol (VoIP) service. But to me and probably most people, Skype is a video chatting service that allows us to see friends that are miles away, lets us interview face-to-face with companies that are based across the country or even the world, and generally maintain ties with people that are far away. It offers webcam, microphone, and text chatting features and allows video conferencing, audio conferencing, and calls to and from landlines.

Skype was founded and released in 2003 by Janus Friis and Niklas Zennström. The actual software was created by Ahti Heinla, Priit Kasesalu, and Jaan Tallinn. The founders and engineers were also behind the peer-to-peer file sharing software, Kazaa. After two years, Skype was acquired by eBay Inc. on September 12, 2005 for about $2.6 billion in cash and eBay stock. And after another six years, Skype was bought again, this time by Microsoft Corporation on May 10, 2011 for about $8.5 billion dollars. Skype is still a division of Microsoft Corporation today.

                Under Microsoft, Skype currently offers customers a Skype account, video and voice calls to any other Skype user, and instant messaging and file sharing, all free of charge. Users must pay for services such as calls to mobile phones and landlines, text messaging, and group video calls with up to 10 people. Those are the basic features of Skype, but there are many twists on them. For example, Skype can be used not only on a computer, but also on a mobile device, a tablet, a TV, and a landline.

                With so many features, Skype is implemented both privately and professionally on various systems by people worldwide, from social calls to Skype interviews. The percentage of international calling that is driven by Skype has jumped from 2.9% in 2005 to 13% in 2010, showing that the relevance of Skype has been increasing. Skype is also available on a range of platforms and released its own mobile phone in October of 2007 called 3 Skypephone. The versatility of platforms Skype is compatible with allows almost everyone with an internet connection to use Skype. Skype only works online though, so its growing popularity in the world of calling seems to forecast a movement from plain voice calling towards more video chatting and interacting across the World Wide Web.  Just recently in 2011, Skype partnered with Comcast to give customers the opportunity to video chat using their HDTVs.

Skype’s rise will allow people to stay more connected but also brings up the possibility of security and privacy issues. Skype claims to be securely encrypted but a third party investigation of Skype’s security and methodology in 2006 revealed several security issues in their current security model. And since then, there have been various challenges to Skype’s claims of being a secure communication. 
Despite security controversy, Skype continues to become more and more popular and widely used. It allows people to stay connected regardless of distance and promises to be important in the future of communication and in the future of the World Wide Web.


Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skype
              http://beta.skype.com/en/

Megaupload


Megaupload


What is Megaupload?

Megaupload is a file-sharing website founded in 2005 and at its peak, the 13th most frequently visited website on the Internet (according to the Department of Justice). With 50 million active users per day, 180 million registered users, and about 800 file transfers a day, Megaupload quickly became a household name, but for the wrong reasons (but we'll get into that later).

Through Megaupload, one could store large amounts of data for safe keeping, post videos for your friends, or send files too large for emails. There are similar file-sharing sites that provide the same sort of services, such as Dropbox, Mediafire, and SugarSync, but none that reached Megaupload's massive audience. So what made Megaupload so popular? Before discussing that, we first need to take a quick detour into how piracy has affected the internet.


Piracy

Piracy is the act of copyright infringement intentionally committed for financial gain. Until online piracy, this usually referred to bootleg DVDs, or burned CDs. Today however, copyright holders have started to describe piracy as online copyright infringement. Piracy affects movie sales, music sales, and especially the gaming industry. Why wait for a DVD release when you can have a copy downloaded in ten minutes with high definition quality? There are even search engines that have been created and maintained strictly for searching for pirated material (the most famous is ThePirateBay).

Current page for www.megaupload.com

There are advocates both for and against piracy and the debate has a lot of implications outside of the media realm. For example, online anonymity is a large issue that is facing teens and young adults. In order to crack down on piracy, online anonymity must be wiped out. But since most people are attached at the waist to a mobile device with wireless internet access, no anonymity means everyone can be tracked. Doesn't sound too bad, right? Well let's look at some security leaks over the past year: the FBI, the Pentagon, Sony's Playstation network, the Arizona Police Department, etc. The problem with tracking everyone is that all of that data is one hacker away from being public knowledge. So do we let piracy slip through the cracks and keep our personal data safe, or do we punish pirates by tracking everyone and dangle all of that personal data for the best hacker? I do not have an answer, but as we return to discussing Megaupload, I will show that the answer (whether it be right or wrong) may be coming very soon.


Megaupload vs. United States Department of Justice

Megaupload sets itself apart from other file-sharing sites by having a real knack for looking the other way. Without restricting what its users can upload to its servers, illegal content soon found its new home. It became incredibly easy to find any movie, television show, or song you wanted. No download necessary either, any video could be streamed to your computer with ease. Megaupload soon became a haven for pirates and the go to website for anyone looking for something to watch. Also, because of its large audience, Megaupload provided ease of mind for those too timid to illegal download material from the Internet by abusing the safety that there numbers provided.

On January 19th, 2012, the United States Department of Justice shut down the website and by the next day, had arrested the CEO (Kim Dotcom) and three other executives when the New Zealand Police department (by request of the FBI) raided Dotcom's mansion. In an attempt to extradite Dotcom and company to the US, the FBI and the DoJ began building a case for copyright infringement. However, because of how loosely defined Internet law is in terms of copyright infringement, the US' case was filled with holes and mistakes. One such mistake was that the warrants used in the raid of Dotcom's estate were too general, and would leave all evidence acquired inadmissible to court. There were also many rumors circulating that the US had been spying on Dotcom for years.

The indictment on Dotcom is as follows:
  • In practice, the "vast majority" of users do not have any significant long term private storage capability. Continued storage is dependent upon regular downloads of the file occurring. Files not downloaded are rapidly removed in most cases, whereas popular downloaded files are retained. (items 7 – 8)
  • Because only a small portion of users pay for storage, the business is dependent upon advertising. Adverts are primarily viewed when files are downloaded and the business model is therefore not based upon storage but upon maximizing downloads. (items 7 – 8)
  • Persons indicted have "instructed individual users how to locate links to infringing content on the Mega Sites ... [and] ... have also shared with each other comments from Mega Site users demonstrating that they have used or are attempting to use the Mega Sites to get infringing copies of copyrighted content." (item 13)
  • Persons indicted, unlike the public, are not reliant upon links to stored files, but can search the internal database directly. It is claimed they have "searched the internal database for their associates and themselves so that they may directly access copyright-infringing content". (item 14)
  • A comprehensive takedown method is in use to identify child pornography, but not deployed to remove infringing content. (item 24)
  • Infringing users did not have their accounts terminated, and the defendants "made no significant effort to identify users who were using the Mega Sites or services to infringe copyrights, to prevent the uploading of infringing copies of copyrighted materials, or to identify infringing copies of copyrighted works" (item 55–56)
  • An incentive program was adopted encouraging the upload of "popular" files in return for payments to successful uploaders. (item 69eet al.)
  • Defendants explicitly discussed evasion and infringement issues, including an attempt to copy and upload the entire content of YouTube. (items 69i-l. YouTube: items 69 i,j,l,s)

Kim Dotcom has still not been extradited to the US, nor will he seem to be in the foreseeable future. Clinging to the protection provided him by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which acts as a safe harbor for any site that takes down illegal material as soon as it is made aware of it (proper users of this act are sites like YouTube), Dotcom will most likely avoid any legal repercussions as long as he continues to say that it would be impossible to know what on his site is illegal and what is legal.

Kim Dotcom, as he is viewed by his fans

Not only is Dotcom seemingly untouchable, but “the Internet” will defend him to the end. Without any request from Dotcom, the hacking group “Anonymous” took down the Department of Justice's website with a Distributed Denial of Service (think of this as billions of requests to a single website that will slow the website to a crawl, and even take it down completely), and then began downloading internal information when the defenses were down. This information was later released to the public on Pastebin and WikiLeaks.


Future for Megaupload and Kim Dotcom


Kim Dotcom has promised two sites to be released on January 19th, 2013: Megabox (a music download site to rival Spotify) and Mega (which will be a new and improved version of Megaupload). With the US not making any progress in there case against Kim Dotcom, Megaupload will most likely find new life on Mega.

Reddit


REDDIT

Background
By definition Reddit is a social news website where the registered users submit content in the form of either a link or a text "self" post. Other users then vote the submission "up" or "down", which is used to rank the post and determine its position on the site's pages and front page. It is based in San Francisco, California. It was founded by Steve Huffman and Alexis Ohanian, then acquired by Conde Nast Publications, which then split it with Advance Publications.

How It Works
The website consists of many registered users who can view and  submit entries on bulletin board system. Entries are organized into areas of interest called subreddits. Users can choose to view multiple subreddits together on their frontpage. This is an example of a post.


 
Popular posts are higher up on the board. The ranking system of reddit isn’t very complicated and is open source. It can be read in detail at http://amix.dk/blog/post/19588, But basically

1. Submission time is a very important parameter, generally newer stories will rank higher than older
2.The first 10 upvotes count as high as the next 100. E.g. a story that has 10 upvotes and a story that has 50 upvotes will have a similar ranking
3.             3. Controversial stories that get similar amounts of upvotes and downvotes will get a low ranking compared to stories that mainly get up-votes.

Relevance and How It can Change the World
Reddit is one of the worlds best examples of a website allowing large numbers of people to freely interact on topics of their choice. It lets people who want to say something, say it to everyone and anyone who wants to listen can freely listen to anyone of their choice; and of course by listen I mean read.
Reddit has started a new type of culture based on the World Wide Web. People who regularly reddit are part of this meta culture, where people are truly free to talk to who they like and act like what they want. Reddit is something that finally allows proper communication on a large scale. No view can be influenced as there are a massive number of people checking for validity and giving their opinions. Reddit was one of the best ways to raise awareness of SOPA and the rally to restore sanity.
To add to the massive communication base, redditors enjoy many inside jokes, know of many personal life changing stories and get the opportunity to talk to some important people. Very educational if you ask me, However, nothing can beat the University of reddit (an initiative towards online education) that is currently building up to reach its full potential.
Websites like reddit is where the future of communication lies, not between governments or politians but between the regular people of the world. 

Sources
  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reddit
  2. http://amix.dk/blog/post/19588
  3. http://www.reddit.com

Online Dating- The Ultimate Personal Ad


Online Dating- The Ultimate Personal Ad
By Shannon Henley
November 20, 2012

The origins of online dating can be traced back to hundreds of years before the internet was even thought of. By the early eighteenth century, it was popular for men to hire agencies who would place ads in newspapers for them in order to help them find a wife. In the early twentieth century, personal ads were found in most mainstream papers, but were not nearly as popular as they had been in the past. Personals fell out of favor in the 1960s only to become acceptable again in the 1990s. The ads slowly made their way onto the internet, where now whole companies operate online forums and communities meant to bring potential couples together.

Popular dating sites today include sites for the general population such as Match.com, Plenty of Fish, OkCupid, Zoosk, and eHarmony, but many sites are catered to specific groups of people: OurTime.com for singles over 50 years of age, Jdate.com for Jewish singles, ChristianMingle.com, SingleParentMeet.com, etc. A 2009 study showed that 47.5% of online dating site users were male, while 52.5% were women. The study found that more sociable people are more inclined to join an online dating site, and, more importantly, found that online daters do not fit the low self-esteem, lonely, desperate profile that is often ascribed to them. People of all shapes, sizes, races, religions, and socio-economic backgrounds are using online dating sites today.

Different dating sites use different methods of matching participants up with one another. Many focus on the use of questionnaires, while some go to the extremes of comparing the DNA and hormone levels of their participants. There is no useful way to determine which methodologies are the most affective, because there are so many other factors involved in whether or not an online match-up is successful. (Of course, that doesn’t stop dating sites from competing with each other- the business of online dating sites is constantly growing and is expected to gross $1.7 billion in the year 2013.)

I wanted to take a look at how online dating really works, so I interviewed my friend Leah*, who signed up for OkCupid to give a mutual friend her opinion on his profile but ended up sticking around and using the site for several months. As a college student, Leah appreciated the affordability (It’s free!) and accessibility of OkCupid, which she said was easy to use on a daily basis, especially through the use of the OkCupid iPhone app. She was matched with people by OkCupid based on questions that she answered; the more questions she answered, the more men she would be matched with. While some questions were free answer, others were multiple choice: for example, the question, “Do you prefer dogs or cats?” would have the following options: “Dogs”, “Cats”, “Both”, or “Neither”. Once Leah answered this type of question, she could then describe the degree of importance of being matched with someone who answered the question similarly. Through this method, OkCupid users are able to make sure they don’t get matched with people with certain characteristics that they find undesirable (i.e. someone who doesn’t like sports or someone who is homophobic).

Leah would communicate with matches through messaging, and could peruse the profiles of those matches to view their answers for any question they had answered on the site, in order to compare which questions they answered similarly and which they did not.

Leah ultimately had a nice experience on OkCupid. She enjoyed having intellectual conversations with matches, and she also felt that the whole process of answering questions on the site helped her to get to know herself better. She loved that the site allowed her to meet people that were studying different subjects in school or that weren’t in college. When she did go on dates with men she met on the site, she always had fun and felt it was sort of like going on a blind date. One complaint she had, though, was that she actually sometimes felt she had too much in common with her matches. (On the one hand, this means that OkCupid does a great job matching based on similarities, on the other hand, it means that compatibility in terms of the fact that “opposites attract” isn’t really taken into consideration.) Leah said she could never be in a relationship with someone that was exactly like her, and therefore could never date many of the men that she was matched up with on the site. After a while, Leah missed the initial human interaction of meeting someone new and realizing that she had things in common with them. She said it was “easy to get caught up in the fact that [she] was a 92% match with someone” instead of focusing on the connection that she had with them when she met them in person. When asked if she would ever make an online dating profile again some time the road, though, Leah’s answer was, “Absolutely.”

Online dating sites are the most personal form of social media. Like other forms of social media, online dating is growing rapidly popular and the online dating population is growing more and more diverse. Just as so many other forms of communication were revolutionized by the invention of the internet, the internet completely transformed the centuries-old personal ad through making online dating possible, and thus transformed the way that many people meet and date one another.


*Name changed for privacy


Sources:

Grohol, J. (2009). Who Uses Internet Dating?. Psych Central. Retrieved on November 20, 2012, from http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/07/23/who-uses-internet-dating/

Tugend, Alina (2009).  Blinded by Science in the Online Dating Game. The New York Times. Retrieved on November 20, 2012 from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/internet/18shortcuts.html?pagewanted=1&_r=0&ref=technology

Whipps, Heather. (2009). The 300-year History of Internet Dating. Live Science. Retrieved on November 20, 2012 from
http://www.livescience.com/3362-300-year-history-internet-dating.html

Web Conferencing


Web conferencing, by definition, provides the ability to globally host conferences in remote locations, better known as webinars. This function originated from real-time chat facilities in the late 1980s, web-based/instant messaging software in the mid-1990, and eventually the introduction of the first web conferencing software from Starlight Networks late-1990s.

Web conferencing has enabled global real-time face to face communication. 

Technologically speaking, this is enabled through TCP/IP connections, which enables “real-time point-to-point communications” and “multicast communications” from a sender to specified recipients via three forms of communication: text messages, voice, and video. This technology is particularly convenient among businesses given its ability to support meetings, lectures, and presentations to any individual with a computer. 

Today, there are a multitude of proprietary softwares available via hard copy and download to provide a complete web conferencing solution. Users are able to determine and customize access and events based upon features provided with the purchased software. Access refers to whether participants are limited to a single individual, or perhaps a group of individuals, and features pertain to integration with a calendar, email application, polls, slide show presentations, streaming video, web tours, whiteboards, text chat, screen sharing, video conferencing, and a number of other options. 

Presently, many Fortune 500 companies license softwares to host secure webinars across functions, departments, and divisions. For example, Deloitte utilizes Cisco WebEx Meeting to host virtual monthly town hall meetings with thousands in attendance. Overall, the ability for corporations to host and broadcast meetings online has brought greater convenience and efficiency in communication. 

The most popular of these web conferencing options are Watchitoo, Cisco WebEx Meeting, and Microsoft Office Live Meeting. Let us compare their technical specifications: 

1. Watchitoo
Software needed: Web-based; no downloads
Invitation tools: Internal email invitations; multiple embed locations
Collaboration tools: Screen sharing; up to 25 presenters; text chat; questions; Twitter/Facebook posting; videoconferencing; video editing, whiteboard
Recording: Yes
Polling/Surveys: Arriving soon 
Pricing: Free for up to 5 people; up to 25 people for $39/month plan; up to 50 people for $49/month plan with a larger storage capacity 

2. Cisco WebEx Meeting
Software needed: No downloads; runs on any Internet server/mobile device
Invitation tools: Meeting invitations; automated phone call; text message; email from local client/instant message
Collaboration tools: Screen sharing via desktop/applications; multiple presenters; annotating tools; text chat; teleconferencing; VoIP; mobile access for smartphones; videoconferencing
Recording: Yes
Polling/Surveys: Yes
Pricing: $49/month or $468/year per host 

3. Microsoft Office Live Meeting 
Software required: No downloads; supports instant Web conferencing for any Windows, Mac or Linux operating system 
Invitation tools: Linked into Microsoft Outlook as an add-in; provide a Meet Now button; can invite via IM
Collaboration tools: Screen sharing via desktop/applications; multiple presenters; annotating tools; text chat; teleconferencing; VoIP; videoconferencing
Recording: Yes
Polling/Surveys: Yes
Pricing: up to 250 participants per meeting at $4.50/month per user; Professional Edition users, up to 1,250 participants per meeting at $16/month per user 

Open software is also available, with a range of them developed for both corporate and generic uses. These types of softwares are often utilized by smaller companies or groups who either prefer low-cost options or may simply not need the resources tagged along with proprietary software. These options typically are suitable for low key forms of communication, particularly when looking to connect with an individual difficult to reach face-to-face. 

The favorites among open source web conferencing softwares are AnyMeeting (previously known as Freebinar), Vyew, and Mikogo. Let us compare their technical capabilities: 

1. AnyMeeting
Ad-based, but not intrusive for the hosts/attendees. Allows for meetings up to 200 people, with functions, such as screen sharing, VoIP, phone conferencing, meeting recording, follow up functionality. Web-based, so small download is only needed for screen sharing plugin.

2. Vyew
Contains features-rich web conferencing software. Has slightly complex controls and features. Supports Windows, Mac, and Linux. Allows for meetings up to 10 participants, and video conferences. No record or playback features. Meeting rooms can be created and saved. 


3. Mikogo 
Dull interface, but excellent functionality. Allows for meetings up to 10 participants, with all essential online meeting tool features. Includes meeting recording, switching between presenters and pause screen sharing. Meeting quality can be controlled, e.g. bandwidth. 

The deployment of web conferences is available via either a hosting service, software, or appliance. Essentially these programs combine tools already utilized for web pages and Internet communication, and subsequently bundle these tools into one interface, creating an interactive environment for online meetings. These technical tools consist of HTML, XML and ASP markup, Java scripts, animation with Flash, instant text messaging, and streaming audio/video. Controls for security and encryption are typically enabled through the requirement of moderators/attendees to create and sign in with a login name and password. SSL/TLS encryption may also be used to protect data. To ensure further confidentiality, companies may host web conferences on internal servers to ensure that all data and content transmitted is behind their corporate firewall. 

Despite the convenience of web conferencing, it can be viewed as impersonal and detached. In addition, technology issues related to accessing the internet and connecting to Web meetings may arise. 

Example of video conferencing. 

Nevertheless, web conferencing has allowed the World Wide Web to become increasingly interactive, and has enabled people to connect with one another on a new level. For corporations particularly, web conferencing has enabled new operational and management tactics to further increase productivity, efficiency, and communication. Individuals are able to effectively discuss and collaborate remotely, and in conditions that mimic that of reality. In the future, greater customization options as well as interaction solutions can be expected. 

Twitter's Role in the Global Community


Twitter


Twitter is a social networking site that was founded in 2006 in San Francisco.  Unlike most sites however, Twitter limits the post lengths of the users, which are designated as tweets, to 140 total characters.  This forces users to be concise and clever enough to have their thoughts read by others.  The brevity of posts makes it ideal to be read and posted from a cell phone, and the company provides apps for a great variety of mobile devices.  Users choose an available handle and can choose to follow other users: tweets of people who are followed then appear in the twitter feed on the home page.  Users can also retweet posts from others so that popular thoughts can be shared with others.  While this idea seems like a novelty, the site has gained traction worldwide; it is currently in use by the majority of nations across the world and is available in over 20 languages.  The site has gained attention by even heavy hitters in the global community.  Athletes, movie stars, politicians, and businesses all flock to the site to share their ideas and communicate on the global stage. (https://twitter.com/about)

Arab Spring

This global subscriber base has found surprisingly creative uses for Twitter that are probably outside the initial intentions of the creators.  The Arab Spring movement in early 2011 utilized Twitter and other social media websites to organize protests.  Egyptian protesters  who objected to abuses of the regime of President Hosni Mubarak, had over 85,000 people pledge to attend protests via social media sites.  Because of the role of Twitter and other sites in coordinating protests, the former President cut off the internet connection, but he was eventually pressured to resign by the global community because of his mistreatment of protesters  (http://harvardhrj.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/185-220.pdf)

The revolution in Egypt, that captured headlines across the globe was facilitated by the use of Twitter.  
Cover Credit: PHOTOGRAPH BY CORENTIN FOHLEN / SIPA PRESS

Occupy Wall Street

Taking cues from their Middle Eastern brothers, Twitter users in the US helped to organize protests during the summer of the same year, during this current recession.  The movement, deemed Occupy Wall Street, protested a variety of abuses by the wealthiest Americans.  While the movement originally started in Wall Street, similar protests developed in cities across the country.  The main account of Occupy Wall Street alone gained over 94,000 followers. (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/25/business/media/occupy-movement-focuses-on-staying-current-on-social-networks.html)

National Crisis

Apart from protests, Twitter has also proved to be an interesting tool during times of disaster.  During a terrorist attack in Mumbai in 2008, people used twitter as a first hand news source, as people tried to make sense of the violence and respond to loved ones.  While the accuracy of certain information was called into questions, the huge spike in activity showed that people turn to social media even during a disaster. (http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/11/27/mumbai.twitter/index.html)

Role in the News

In the 24-hour news cycle, Twitter has embedded itself into many professional broadcasts.  The value of the information gathered from Twitter is often questioned, but this trend appears to have staying power.  News stations like CNN will often turn to Twitter to augment their on-site reporting, trying to gain better first-hand accounts of stories.  The site also seemed to play a significant role during the Presidential debates this year.  Analysts would follow Twitter trends during the debates and report to the viewers at home.  Tweets would surge during memorable moments like Romney commenting on Big Bird.  The comment also spawned a fake Twitter account for the Sesame Street character.  When a scandal breaks out, sites like Twitter seem to be a popular pulpit by which the offender can address the world.  This is especially true of ESPN, which seems to cover tweets from athletes almost as much as they cover actual highlights.  The wide acceptance of Twitter from the professional media shows that it is here to stay.

In addition to reporting the tweets of others, ESPN has its own Twitter feed. (Screenshot from Twitter)