Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Online Dating- The Ultimate Personal Ad


Online Dating- The Ultimate Personal Ad
By Shannon Henley
November 20, 2012

The origins of online dating can be traced back to hundreds of years before the internet was even thought of. By the early eighteenth century, it was popular for men to hire agencies who would place ads in newspapers for them in order to help them find a wife. In the early twentieth century, personal ads were found in most mainstream papers, but were not nearly as popular as they had been in the past. Personals fell out of favor in the 1960s only to become acceptable again in the 1990s. The ads slowly made their way onto the internet, where now whole companies operate online forums and communities meant to bring potential couples together.

Popular dating sites today include sites for the general population such as Match.com, Plenty of Fish, OkCupid, Zoosk, and eHarmony, but many sites are catered to specific groups of people: OurTime.com for singles over 50 years of age, Jdate.com for Jewish singles, ChristianMingle.com, SingleParentMeet.com, etc. A 2009 study showed that 47.5% of online dating site users were male, while 52.5% were women. The study found that more sociable people are more inclined to join an online dating site, and, more importantly, found that online daters do not fit the low self-esteem, lonely, desperate profile that is often ascribed to them. People of all shapes, sizes, races, religions, and socio-economic backgrounds are using online dating sites today.

Different dating sites use different methods of matching participants up with one another. Many focus on the use of questionnaires, while some go to the extremes of comparing the DNA and hormone levels of their participants. There is no useful way to determine which methodologies are the most affective, because there are so many other factors involved in whether or not an online match-up is successful. (Of course, that doesn’t stop dating sites from competing with each other- the business of online dating sites is constantly growing and is expected to gross $1.7 billion in the year 2013.)

I wanted to take a look at how online dating really works, so I interviewed my friend Leah*, who signed up for OkCupid to give a mutual friend her opinion on his profile but ended up sticking around and using the site for several months. As a college student, Leah appreciated the affordability (It’s free!) and accessibility of OkCupid, which she said was easy to use on a daily basis, especially through the use of the OkCupid iPhone app. She was matched with people by OkCupid based on questions that she answered; the more questions she answered, the more men she would be matched with. While some questions were free answer, others were multiple choice: for example, the question, “Do you prefer dogs or cats?” would have the following options: “Dogs”, “Cats”, “Both”, or “Neither”. Once Leah answered this type of question, she could then describe the degree of importance of being matched with someone who answered the question similarly. Through this method, OkCupid users are able to make sure they don’t get matched with people with certain characteristics that they find undesirable (i.e. someone who doesn’t like sports or someone who is homophobic).

Leah would communicate with matches through messaging, and could peruse the profiles of those matches to view their answers for any question they had answered on the site, in order to compare which questions they answered similarly and which they did not.

Leah ultimately had a nice experience on OkCupid. She enjoyed having intellectual conversations with matches, and she also felt that the whole process of answering questions on the site helped her to get to know herself better. She loved that the site allowed her to meet people that were studying different subjects in school or that weren’t in college. When she did go on dates with men she met on the site, she always had fun and felt it was sort of like going on a blind date. One complaint she had, though, was that she actually sometimes felt she had too much in common with her matches. (On the one hand, this means that OkCupid does a great job matching based on similarities, on the other hand, it means that compatibility in terms of the fact that “opposites attract” isn’t really taken into consideration.) Leah said she could never be in a relationship with someone that was exactly like her, and therefore could never date many of the men that she was matched up with on the site. After a while, Leah missed the initial human interaction of meeting someone new and realizing that she had things in common with them. She said it was “easy to get caught up in the fact that [she] was a 92% match with someone” instead of focusing on the connection that she had with them when she met them in person. When asked if she would ever make an online dating profile again some time the road, though, Leah’s answer was, “Absolutely.”

Online dating sites are the most personal form of social media. Like other forms of social media, online dating is growing rapidly popular and the online dating population is growing more and more diverse. Just as so many other forms of communication were revolutionized by the invention of the internet, the internet completely transformed the centuries-old personal ad through making online dating possible, and thus transformed the way that many people meet and date one another.


*Name changed for privacy


Sources:

Grohol, J. (2009). Who Uses Internet Dating?. Psych Central. Retrieved on November 20, 2012, from http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/07/23/who-uses-internet-dating/

Tugend, Alina (2009).  Blinded by Science in the Online Dating Game. The New York Times. Retrieved on November 20, 2012 from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/internet/18shortcuts.html?pagewanted=1&_r=0&ref=technology

Whipps, Heather. (2009). The 300-year History of Internet Dating. Live Science. Retrieved on November 20, 2012 from
http://www.livescience.com/3362-300-year-history-internet-dating.html

No comments:

Post a Comment